Head to head · as of October 2026

Rowhouse vs RavenApps Grids

RavenApps Grids is a native Lightning grid from a small London company, and it reaches across objects further than Rowhouse. Rowhouse groups, pastes and undoes, with no seat price and no edition limit.

Switching from RavenApps Grids
The short answer

Which one, when

  • You need parent, child, grandchild and unrelated objects in one editable gridRavenApps Grids. Rowhouse shows one object per grid, with fields of related records up to five lookups away and child tables under each row, but no unrelated objects.
  • Users group and subtotal lists, paste ranges from a spreadsheet, or undo before they saveRowhouse. RavenApps documents no row grouping and no undo, and takes pasted cells through its 500-row import dialog and nowhere else.
  • You need more than two grids or two users in production without a per-seat contractRowhouse. RavenApps’ free edition stops at two of each, and its terms let the vendor withdraw or change it without notice.
Concede the craft

Where RavenApps Grids is the better choice

  • Reach across objects. Nested and polymorphic subqueries, related grids that drill into child and grandchild records, and unrelated objects joined through variables. Rowhouse is behind here.
  • Release pace. Fifteen documented releases between January and September 2026, including dependent picklist editing, Excel workbook export and a spreadsheet import with upsert.
  • A free sandbox with no clock. Every sandbox runs the full Pro edition with no user or time limit, so an evaluation needs no trial request.
  • Things Rowhouse does not do yet. RavenApps edits rich text in the cell and places grids on Experience Cloud pages in its Enterprise tier.
Where Rowhouse is ahead
  • Undo and redo
  • Copy and paste Excel ranges
  • Row grouping
  • Subtotals and aggregates
  • Keyboard navigation
  • Large lists
What RavenApps Grids has that Rowhouse is adding
  • Experience CloudComing soon
  • AI features (in part)Coming soon
Rowhouse, in the product

What your users would work in

A grid your team edits like a spreadsheet

Grouped by stage with sums, overdue dates in red, big deals in green — every rule set on the Grid Admin tab, without code.

Figure 1. The finished grid: grouped by stage in the picklist's order, a sum of amounts per stage and in total, overdue close dates in red, big deals in green, deals in negotiation marked with a purple bar. Collapsed stages still count in the Total.

Built on a tab in Salesforce

One editor for the grid, its columns, display rules, filters, actions and child tables, checked as you type. Everything you build is Custom Metadata in your org.

Figure 2. The Grid Admin tab, on the Grid tab of the Account People grid. Close and Save are at the top, beside the grid's name; Save stays grey until something changes. Beside the tabs, the Grid Guide says what the open tab's settings do: Open ↗ opens that part of this page, and Hide help folds it away.
29 capabilities

Rowhouse and RavenApps Grids, side by side

Capabilities documented, of the 30 compared Rowhouse: 22 yes, 4 partial, 4 roadmap; RavenApps Grids: 17 yes, 8 partial. Rowhouse 26 / 30 RavenApps Grids 25 / 30
DocumentedIn partRowhouse: coming soonRowhouse: roadmap
Figure 3. Of the 30 capabilities in our comparison, how many each product documents in full or in part. Competitor values are each vendor’s own published documentation; nothing was installed or tested. The number counts full and partial support together.
Yes · Partial · Not documented. For Rowhouse, Coming soon means being built now and Roadmap means planned. Competitor values are the vendors’ own published documentation, read 2026-10-06; nothing was installed or tested. Rowhouse values come from its own product documentation. Capabilities none of these products has are left out.
CapabilityRowhouseRavenApps Grids
Editing
Inline edit Yes Yes
Mass edit: many cells, one save Yes Yes
Update a field across a selection Yes Yes
Inline create (add a row) Yes Yes
Delete from the grid Yes Yes
Undo and redo Yes No
Copy and paste Excel ranges Yes Partial
Finding and shaping
Resize and reorder columns Yes Yes
Multi-column sort Yes Yes
Filtering Yes Yes
Row grouping Yes No
Subtotals and aggregates Yes Partial
Conditional formatting Yes Yes
Related data
Several objects in one grid Partial Yes
Parent and child expand under a row Yes Yes
Moving data
Export Yes Yes
Import and upsert Yes Yes
Views and placement
Named, shareable saved views Partial Partial
Lightning page embed Yes Yes
Flow screen component Roadmap Not documented
Experience Cloud Roadmap Yes
Mobile Partial Partial
Actions
Row actions, flows and quick actions Yes Yes
Access, security and scale
Keyboard navigation Yes Partial
Screen reader Yes Not documented
Field, object and sharing security Yes Yes
Shield Platform Encryption Partial Partial
Large lists Yes Partial
AI features Roadmap Partial
Cost

Three years, at 25, 50 and 250 users

RavenApps Grids’ license is a per-user list price, so its cost grows with every person added. Rowhouse has no license fee at any size; what it costs is the time to run it.

Three-year cost as the team grows Rowhouse: $4,950 at 25, $4,950 at 50, $4,950 at 250; RavenApps Grids: $20,985 at 25, $35,445 at 50, $139,650 at 250. $0$50k$100k$150k 2550250 users RavenApps Grids $140kRowhouse $5k
Figure 4. Three-year cost at 25, 50 and 250 users: license, implementation and three years of administration, joined by straight lines. Competitor figures are the midpoint of the low and high cases in our October 2026 research. License figures are list prices from the AppExchange listing or the vendor's price page; implementation and ongoing admin are estimates, and no product is shown at zero ongoing cost. Rowhouse’s line is the same model applied to a free license. Model as of 2026-10-06. Try your own user count in the ROI calculator →
Three-year cost at 25 users License, implementation and three years of administration, lowest first: Rowhouse $4,950; RavenApps Grids $20,985. Rowhouse $4,950 RavenApps Grids $20,985
License, published list priceImplementation and administration, estimated
Figure 5. Three-year cost at 25 users: license, implementation and three years of administration. Competitor figures are the midpoint of the low and high cases in our October 2026 research. License figures are list prices from the AppExchange listing or the vendor's price page; implementation and ongoing admin are estimates, and no product is shown at zero ongoing cost. Administration is priced at $75 an hour, and Rowhouse’s figure is the same model applied to a free license. Model as of 2026-10-06.
Three-year cost at 50 users License, implementation and three years of administration, lowest first: Rowhouse $4,950; RavenApps Grids $35,445. Rowhouse $4,950 RavenApps Grids $35,445
License, published list priceImplementation and administration, estimated
Figure 6. Three-year cost at 50 users: license, implementation and three years of administration. Competitor figures are the midpoint of the low and high cases in our October 2026 research. License figures are list prices from the AppExchange listing or the vendor's price page; implementation and ongoing admin are estimates, and no product is shown at zero ongoing cost. Administration is priced at $75 an hour, and Rowhouse’s figure is the same model applied to a free license. Model as of 2026-10-06.
Three-year cost at 250 users License, implementation and three years of administration, lowest first: Rowhouse $4,950; RavenApps Grids $139,650. Rowhouse $4,950 RavenApps Grids $139,650
License, published list priceImplementation and administration, estimated
Figure 7. Three-year cost at 250 users: license, implementation and three years of administration. Competitor figures are the midpoint of the low and high cases in our October 2026 research. License figures are list prices from the AppExchange listing or the vendor's price page; implementation and ongoing admin are estimates, and no product is shown at zero ongoing cost. Administration is priced at $75 an hour, and Rowhouse’s figure is the same model applied to a free license. Model as of 2026-10-06.
Your configuration

Where your grids are kept

RavenApps Grids

Grid configuration (SOQL string plus JSON columns, filters, sorts and summaries stored on Grid custom-object records in the subscriber org).

Rowhouse

Seven Custom Metadata types in your org: built in a sandbox, moved in a change set, kept in source control, and never overwritten by an upgrade.

Two native grids, two different bets

Both are Lightning Web Components calling Apex in your org. RavenApps bets on reach and on shipping fast. Each grid is a SOQL query and JSON column definitions on a record of its own custom object. Advanced features mean writing that JSON by hand, which two of its reviewers mention, and each conditional-formatting rule is a formula field you add to the object.

Rowhouse bets on the spreadsheet: ranges, paste and fill down, 100 undo steps, three levels of grouping with subtotals, and grids kept as Custom Metadata.

The free edition, read closely

RavenApps’ free edition is real and is advertised on its listing: two active grids and two users in production. Its terms call it a trial with no end date that RavenApps may withdraw or change at any time without notice. Free and Pro cannot share an org, and an org cannot move back from Pro to Free. Pro’s price page adds 15% for support and maintenance and a ten-user minimum purchase, which an FAQ on the same page contradicts.

Rowhouse has no edition to outgrow. Its Apache-2.0 license grant is perpetual and irrevocable.

Checked 2026-10-07; due for a re-check by 2027-04-07. RavenApps Grids’ values are its vendor’s own published claims; nothing was installed or tested, and RavenApps’ terms bar competitor access and benchmarking, so this comparison is documentary only. Something wrong? Tell us and we will correct it.

FAQ

Rowhouse vs RavenApps Grids: questions

Did you test RavenApps Grids?

No. RavenApps’ terms bar competitors from using the product and from benchmarking it, so this page rests on its listing, user guide, release notes, price page and terms.

Is RavenApps Grids free?

In part. Its free edition allows two active grids and two users in a production org, and its terms call that edition a trial RavenApps may withdraw or change without notice; Free and Pro cannot run in the same org. Pro lists at $12 per user per month, billed yearly, and the vendor’s price page adds 15% for support and maintenance. Rowhouse is $0 under Apache-2.0, with no edition limit.

Are both built on Lightning Web Components?

Yes, and both run inside your org, so data residency is not the difference. RavenApps’ user guide says its grid is built on Salesforce’s lightning-datatable component. Rowhouse draws its own table.

Can I run Rowhouse and RavenApps Grids together?

Yes. A paid RavenApps org can run Rowhouse beside it: RavenApps for the cross-object grids and portal pages, Rowhouse for the long tail of plain editable lists that never justified a seat.

Nobody should pay per seat to edit a thousand rows.

Compare it on your own data: install it beside the grid you have, and keep both until you are sure.

Get started